now browsing by month
Teacher, what meditate? What is beyond thinking how do get to meditate on that which is beyond thought? Not meditating what is Zen? Multiple definitions can try, but all of them would be useless. We can more easily tell what is not. It is not a religion or a theory. It is not based on any dogma or philosophy. The essence of Zen is not in any school, teacher or writing although it is sacred. It allows the direct knowledge of oneself above values, Nations and races.
Zen is a form of Buddhism that in China was developed under the name of Chan and in Japan became one of the most important spiritual but also social and artistic. Its principles were applied to all facets of the man. The zen Word is a contraction of zenno, which corresponds to what in China was called Chan and the Dhyana India. In all three cases it can be translated as meditation. Traditionally its origin goes back to the same Buddha who in the so-called sermon on the peak of the Raven, rather than go to his listeners with words remained silent, only making the gesture of showing a flower. One of his disciples, Kashyapa demonstrating that he had understood this teaching of silence, smiled and reached understanding in that moment.
Although there is no document proving it, believed that the Buddha had transmitted zen teaching to Kashyapa, followed by many Indian Patriarchs, until arriving to Bodhidharma. The principles of zen Buddhism came to China from the hand of the monk Bodhidharma, a direct spiritual descendant of the disciple of Buddha Mahakashyapa, around the year 520. According to tradition, Bodhidharma was the founder of the Chan in China in the 6th century A.d. Zen Buddhism in Japan begins to develop from the s. XII taking root with much depth and creative spirit in the Japan culture.
Also the existencial psycotherapy is not made use to treat any nobody much less to affirm itself as ' ' promise to calm inherent malaise to the citizen through the elimination of sintoma' ' . Paraphrasing Alberti and Figueiredo to if relating to the objectives of the psychoanalysis also we affirm that the practical existencial equally does not aim at to eliminate the anguish of the citizen, therefore is from it that the being has the possibility to attribute to a direction its life. The existencial psycotherapy, in the same way, does not promise to waste the malaise, it does not promise to no good and yes a differentiated way of positioning it subject front to its (said) malaise. Still when the classic psychoanalysts say that she does not have in the psychoanalysis the exclusive objective to cure the citizen of its symptom, make a fool and improper reduction of the psycotherapy (any psycotherapy, exactly the mannering one) because the psycotherapies in general are not dedicated only to cure symptoms. when they admit that certainly he has therapeutical effect in the psychoanalysis that ' ' they independem of the ideals of the analyst, but its attainment if of the one in reason of that to speak makes bem' ' , they mention themselves accurately what he makes the psycotherapy existencial.
The psychoanalysis says – in the same way that the existencial psycotherapy – that the psychosis has a proper logic, that is one of the forms of the citizen if to point out in the world, a specific way of constitution and functioning of a citizen. If the psychoanalysts if to dedicate to more read on the fenomenolgica psicopatologia if summer less distant of the psycotherapy. probably will be more frustrate, however less vain people. An ingenuous, infantile, deriving vanity of the study lack. Thus, we find diverse similarities between the practical psicanaltica and the practical psicoterpica, even so the speech of the classic analysis tries to impose itself as one to know to the edge of the interest of the patient in behavior changes.